The problem is not how much we produce. The problem is how we produce, what we produce and how much we waste.
~4000
calories/day/person
produced globally — but only 2,100 are consumed
50%
of fruit and vegetables wasted
globally, every year
Objectives
Pillar 1: Sustainable and organic agriculture
Today’s intensive agriculture depends on fossil fuels, synthetic fertilisers and toxic pesticides. This model degrades soil, pollutes water, destroys biodiversity and contributes heavily to climate change.
The alternative: organic agriculture
“But are yields lower?”
We can feed the entire global population through organic agriculture — if we reduce waste and transform our diets.
The strategic role of plants
Legumes (beans, peas, lentils, soy) naturally fix nitrogen in the soil, reduce the need for synthetic fertilisers and provide high-quality protein.
The key figure
Pillar 2: Pesticides — a major risk to biodiversity
Pesticides are one of the main drivers of biodiversity collapse.
Effects of pesticides
Pillar 3: Fertilisers — impacts on the climate and water
Synthetic fertilisers are extremely energy-intensive (production relies on gas) and a major source of emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O) — a greenhouse gas far more powerful than CO₂.
Major problems
Existing solutions
Pillar 4: Food waste — the key to the system
The most overlooked problem in the food system is waste.
~50%
fruit and vegetables
wasted globally
⅓
of grain
thrown away
⅓
of fish
thrown away
70%
edible
of food thrown away
The essential truth
If we reduce food waste and use land to feed people directly, rather than animals:
We can produce enough organic food for the entire population.
There is no production deficit. There is systemic inefficiency.
The subsidy problem
Alert
Current agricultural policies disproportionately support conventional agriculture, large farms and intensive livestock farming.
Strategic conclusion
Today’s agriculture produces too much, wastes too much and destroys too much. At the same time, the solutions are already known:
We do not need to produce more.
We need to produce more intelligently.
We do not need industrial agriculture.
We need agriculture that works with nature, rather than against it.
The transition is inevitable. The only question is how quickly we make it.
External resources
- FAO report — The pandemic’s impact on meat consumption
- PNAS study — Dietary transition and mortality
- The Lancet report — Food in the Anthropocene
- Environmental impacts of livestock farming — European Commission
- IPCC report — Climate change and food
- Processed meat and colorectal cancer — Harvard
- Antimicrobial resistance — European Commission
- EU Regulation 1924/2006 — Nutrition claims
- FAO — Nutrition education
